doghousekennels

For Christmas I received an interesting gift from a buddy - my really own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a few easy prompts about me provided by my friend Janet.

It's a fascinating read, bytes-the-dust.com and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of writing, however it's likewise a bit repeated, and extremely verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's prompts in collating data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI -book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, since rotating from putting together AI -generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based upon an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can order any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone producing one in anybody's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, developed by AI, and designed "entirely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is meant as a "customised gag gift", and yewiki.org the books do not get offered further.

He hopes to expand his variety, creating various categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps offering an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - offering AI -generated items to human consumers.

It's likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar material based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we in fact imply human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is images. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for creative functions must be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without permission need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very effective but let's develop it morally and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have picked to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to use developers' material on the web to help develop their designs, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and messing up the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, historydb.date a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise highly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and an entire lot of happiness," states the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining among its finest performing markets on the vague promise of development."

A federal government representative stated: "No move will be made up until we are absolutely positive we have a practical plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to assist them accredit their material, access to premium material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI strategy, a national data library containing public data from a vast array of sources will also be provided to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to increase the safety of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector required to share information of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is said to desire the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a number of against AI companies, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the web without their consent, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of elements which can make up reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training information and whether it must be paying for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It became one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its technology for a portion of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I actually desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for larger projects. It is full of errors and hallucinations, and it can be quite tough to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But provided how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm not sure for how long I can stay positive that my substantially slower human writing and modifying abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in worldwide innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.