bit.ly
Will it be a slam dunk for the US sports betting ban?
By Natalie Sherman
bet9ja.com
Business press reporter, New York
bet9ja.com
A ban on sports betting in the majority of US states could be reversed by a case being thought about by the Supreme Court.
The state of New Jersey is challenging the 1992 federal law that mostly banned sports betting gaming, describing the matter as a "states' rights" issue.
The case, which began on Monday, comes after New Jersey homeowners enacted 2011 to legalise sports betting.
A group of sports betting leagues opposes sports betting on video games, which they fear will motivate match-fixing.
Lower courts have consistently ruled versus New Jersey, stating it is within the federal government's power to restrict a state's policy options.
The Supreme Court decided to hear the case however amid a broader shift in American attitudes toward sports betting.
bet9ja.com
Before 1976, Nevada - home of the Las Vegas strip - was the only state with legal casinos outside Native American lands.
But in the last few years, states hungry for tax income in the wake of the monetary crash have actually enacted a rash of looser sports betting laws, gathering large levies on gaming profits.
bet9ja.com
There are now 24 states with commercial gambling establishments - roughly double the number a decade ago.
Despite the ban, which currently exempts Nevada and three other states, illegal sports betting wagering is swarming in the US.
Americans place about $154bn in unlawful sports betting bets every year, according to the American Gaming Association.
The association's president, Geoff Freeman, explained the federal ban, external as an "utter failure" previously this year.
It says the UK is an example of a country where sports betting wagering is prevalent.
"It's time for Washington to stop depriving states of vital tax profits and enable them to reap the benefits of a regulated market," Mr Freeman said.
More than 15 states submitted papers in support of New Jersey in the event. A handful have actually already passed laws to authorise sports betting in case of a change.
'Times have actually changed'
On Monday, as attorneys began arguments for the Supreme Court, some more conservative judges appeared sceptical of the existing law.
The court is anticipated to make a choice in June 2018.
"If we succeed here we might have bets being taken in New Jersey within 2 weeks of a choice by the court," said outbound New Jersey governor Chris Christie after participating in the court hearing. "We're prepared in New Jersey - we're all set to go."
Despite the court's final ruling, Congress may also use up the argument amidst wider conversation about online video gaming and e-sports betting.
Even a few of the expert sports betting leagues have started to alter their positions on the concern of sports betting.
Adam Silver, National Basketball Association commissioner, supported a federal law that would produce an uniform set of rules throughout the US. "Times have actually altered," he wrote in a 2014 opinion piece, external.
Addicts fighting with mobile sports betting
bet9ja.com
3 October 2017
The challenging issue of problem sports betting
31 August 2017
bet9ja.com
1
Will it be a Slam Dunk for the United States Sports Betting Ban?
Chance Padilla edited this page 3 months ago