Add 'Johnson & Johnson Vaccine and Blood Clots'

Johnson-%26-Johnson-Vaccine-and-Blood-Clots.md

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+<br>We've got been reporting on the incidence of uncommon blood clots following the AstraZeneca vaccine in Europe. And now we should report, only one week later, on a really related situation with the Johnson & Johnson (J&J) COVID vaccine. In a joint assertion from the CDC and FDA, they recommended pausing use of the J&J vaccine until experiences of blood clots might be investigated. The situation is considerably totally different now from one month in the past with the AstraZeneca vaccine, but the dilemma is similar. As of April 12, greater than 6.8 million doses of the Johnson & Johnson (Janssen ) vaccine have been administered in the U.S. CDC and FDA are reviewing information involving six reported U.S. J&J vaccine. In these instances, a sort of blood clot referred to as cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) was seen in combination with low ranges of blood platelets (thrombocytopenia). All six cases occurred among girls between the ages of 18 and 48, and signs occurred 6 to 13 days after vaccination.<br>
+
+<br>This may be very similar to the AstraZeneca instances - CVST associated with low platelets (a blood component that initiates clotting) mostly in youthful girls. The incidence here is a bit of less than one case per million vaccines, which is extremely rare, and only one dying out of nearly 7 million. It’s difficult to estimate what number of COVID deaths had been prevented by these same vaccines, but it is at the least within the hundreds. These studies introduced a dilemma for the CDC and FDA. On the one hand, these are uncommon uncomfortable side effects, dwarfed by the advantages of the vaccine in the midst of a surge of a deadly pandemic, when we are in a race against the emergence and spread of extra infectious variants. Also, recommending a pause in the J&J vaccine might improve vaccine hesitancy general,  [BloodVitals SPO2](https://wowfestival.it/index.php/2021/09/19/bulgaria-footura-association/) including of the 2 mRNA vaccines (Pfizer and Moderna) which have so far had no serious unwanted effects. Arguing for the pause is the fact that these circumstances are just like the AstraZeneca cases, and each of these vaccines are modified adenovirus vaccines (once more, very completely different from the mRNA vaccines).<br>
+
+<br>AstraZeneca is a chimpanzee adenovirus and J&J is a human adenovirus, so they're different viruses,  [BloodVitals SPO2](https://mtwd.link/amievhh9411888) but the technology is analogous. Further - the association with low platelets might recommend an autoimmune etiology,  [BloodVitals SPO2](https://quickbio.click/teresafuqua524) which is plausible following a vaccine. Vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCov-19 can result in the rare development of immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia mediated by platelet-activating antibodies in opposition to PF4,  [BloodVitals SPO2](https://git.unigw.com/pedrox26924271) which clinically mimics autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. They were also involved with getting the phrase out to physicians as shortly as attainable to be looking out for this syndrome, which must be treated otherwise than atypical blood clots. And they wished people who recently received the J&J vaccine to be looking out for any symptoms that might point out CVST - severe headaches, confusion, dizziness, trouble talking or issue understanding speech, numbness or weakness within the face/arm/leg, hassle seeing, trouble walking, loss of steadiness or coordination. Finally they have been concerned about the looks of transparency, and that failure to act would possibly sap confidence in the general vaccine program.<br>
+
+<br>So they acted out of what they referred to as "an abundance of caution". Additionally they didn't ban use of the vaccine and the FDA didn't revoke emergency use authorization. They simply really helpful pausing use, and let the states decide how finest to implement that suggestion. The suggestion has attracted both reward and criticism. It's because they have been coping with a no-win situation, especially in relation to public notion and concerns about vaccine hesitancy. Whether or  [BloodVitals SPO2](https://basicweb.tekniskmultimedia.no/hello-world/) not they acted or not, the antivaccine forces on social media would exploit the scenario to provoke as much fear and doubt in regards to the vaccines basically as they can. There isn't a determination that may prevent this, so that you might as nicely do what's finest scientifically after which just clarify the decision as greatest you can. The scientific calculus is all risk vs benefit, and here the situation could be very totally different from the AstraZeneca vaccine, which is crucial to Europe’s vaccine technique, particularly in poorer nations.<br>